<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Guide: Sniffage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: March </title>
		<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92709</link>
		<dc:creator>March </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92709</guid>
		<description>PS you know, I dug out my samples after this topic was raised and reached a conclusion ... and I can&#039;t remember what it was! :&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS you know, I dug out my samples after this topic was raised and reached a conclusion &#8230; and I can&#8217;t remember what it was! :&#8221;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March </title>
		<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92708</link>
		<dc:creator>March </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92708</guid>
		<description>Erin -- Gad, how did I miss that?!?  I&#039;m looking right at it in the Guide... that&#039;s embarrassing.  BTW if you mix them together 50% you get Breath of God. 

No, seriously.  Go look at their website.  Sheesh.

http://www.lush.co.uk/products/Breath_of_God_Perfume_Ltd_Ed-_Large__2928.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erin &#8212; Gad, how did I miss that?!?  I&#8217;m looking right at it in the Guide&#8230; that&#8217;s embarrassing.  BTW if you mix them together 50% you get Breath of God. </p>
<p>No, seriously.  Go look at their website.  Sheesh.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lush.co.uk/products/Breath_of_God_Perfume_Ltd_Ed-_Large__2928.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.lush.co.uk/products/Breath_of_God_Perfume_Ltd_Ed-_Large__2928.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin T </title>
		<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92702</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin T </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-92702</guid>
		<description>Never figured out where this potential error was revealed, but just discovered today that the Exhale and Inhale fragrances attributed to Parfums D&#039;Empire in the Guide are actually Be You Never too Busy to Be Beautiful (Lush offshot) scents.  Now that&#039;s sort of embarrassing, considering the write-ups they get and Exhale&#039;s inclusion on the Best Quiet Fragrances list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never figured out where this potential error was revealed, but just discovered today that the Exhale and Inhale fragrances attributed to Parfums D&#8217;Empire in the Guide are actually Be You Never too Busy to Be Beautiful (Lush offshot) scents.  Now that&#8217;s sort of embarrassing, considering the write-ups they get and Exhale&#8217;s inclusion on the Best Quiet Fragrances list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie </title>
		<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-87338</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-87338</guid>
		<description>Congratulations for the silver! I enjoy this blog, and the other winners as well. I&#039;ve been using them as a reference for sniffing, and will continue to do so despite The Guide. So before I forget, thanks for everything. Anyway, these are the ones I sniffed after reading The Guide.

Beyond Paradise(s) - Didn&#039;t like them before The Guide. I sniffed them again. Still didn&#039;t like them. Worse yet, with &#039;masterful portrait of a gorgeously fresh, fictional, ideal tropical flower&#039; in mind, they reminded me of those robotic dogs that were supposed to be pet replacements. Creepy.

Joy - Luxurious blossoms. This sounds strange but the drydown resembles my perspiration. It was a cold and wet day when I tried it, and I was underdressed so it definitely wasn&#039;t me. I would like to try it again but a spastic twist of my wrist sacrificed the rest of my sample to the closet door. So I&#039;m currently joyless.

Sorry.

Tea Rose - LT nailed this one. This is the only fragrance I bought without sniffing. Found it at Filenes Basement. It was cheap enough to get drunk on. Smells like a bouquet of roses, red petals, green stems, a few crushed leaves, and maybe dethorned. Excellent mileage, too much yellow dye and difficult cap. I like it.

Songes - Pretty, whimsical, on the melodramatic side, and generally, harmless. Very comfortable scent to wear but not something I will buy.

Apres l&#039;Ondee - I love the smell of almonds but I can&#039;t smell this perfume unless my nose is touching my arm where I spritzed it. Smells nice when I can smell it.

L&#039;Heure Bleue - It is complex, strange and beautiful. I don&#039;t see how this perfume can seem edible. The top and middle notes remind of Salon Pas medicated plasters, in a good way. Although I like this fragrance, I don&#039;t want to smell like I&#039;d sprained my back.

Bvlgari Black - Love this one. The burnt rubber bothered me a little but it blended very well with the smoke after a while. It&#039;s so interesting that I didn&#039;t get tired of it throughout the day.

31 Rue Cambon - Love this one too. Classic elegance.

On the whole, The Guide, for me, isn&#039;t any worse or better than the blogs as a reference. I&#039;m not a perfumista, I just like variety, and is therefore collecting fragrances to wear. I can&#039;t appreciate the abstract, neither can I appreciate something I can&#039;t smell. The authors probably tried most of the fragrances on skin but I doubt they lived alone with any one for a whole day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations for the silver! I enjoy this blog, and the other winners as well. I&#8217;ve been using them as a reference for sniffing, and will continue to do so despite The Guide. So before I forget, thanks for everything. Anyway, these are the ones I sniffed after reading The Guide.</p>
<p>Beyond Paradise(s) &#8211; Didn&#8217;t like them before The Guide. I sniffed them again. Still didn&#8217;t like them. Worse yet, with &#8216;masterful portrait of a gorgeously fresh, fictional, ideal tropical flower&#8217; in mind, they reminded me of those robotic dogs that were supposed to be pet replacements. Creepy.</p>
<p>Joy &#8211; Luxurious blossoms. This sounds strange but the drydown resembles my perspiration. It was a cold and wet day when I tried it, and I was underdressed so it definitely wasn&#8217;t me. I would like to try it again but a spastic twist of my wrist sacrificed the rest of my sample to the closet door. So I&#8217;m currently joyless.</p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
<p>Tea Rose &#8211; LT nailed this one. This is the only fragrance I bought without sniffing. Found it at Filenes Basement. It was cheap enough to get drunk on. Smells like a bouquet of roses, red petals, green stems, a few crushed leaves, and maybe dethorned. Excellent mileage, too much yellow dye and difficult cap. I like it.</p>
<p>Songes &#8211; Pretty, whimsical, on the melodramatic side, and generally, harmless. Very comfortable scent to wear but not something I will buy.</p>
<p>Apres l&#8217;Ondee &#8211; I love the smell of almonds but I can&#8217;t smell this perfume unless my nose is touching my arm where I spritzed it. Smells nice when I can smell it.</p>
<p>L&#8217;Heure Bleue &#8211; It is complex, strange and beautiful. I don&#8217;t see how this perfume can seem edible. The top and middle notes remind of Salon Pas medicated plasters, in a good way. Although I like this fragrance, I don&#8217;t want to smell like I&#8217;d sprained my back.</p>
<p>Bvlgari Black &#8211; Love this one. The burnt rubber bothered me a little but it blended very well with the smoke after a while. It&#8217;s so interesting that I didn&#8217;t get tired of it throughout the day.</p>
<p>31 Rue Cambon &#8211; Love this one too. Classic elegance.</p>
<p>On the whole, The Guide, for me, isn&#8217;t any worse or better than the blogs as a reference. I&#8217;m not a perfumista, I just like variety, and is therefore collecting fragrances to wear. I can&#8217;t appreciate the abstract, neither can I appreciate something I can&#8217;t smell. The authors probably tried most of the fragrances on skin but I doubt they lived alone with any one for a whole day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March </title>
		<link>http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-87335</link>
		<dc:creator>March </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perfumeposse.com/2008/05/18/the-guide-sniffage/#comment-87335</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never smelled it.  Sounds great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never smelled it.  Sounds great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

