Spring … maybe … maybe not? And Clinique Aromatics Elixir … yes, again

So, I went into town last week. The 9 AM train was cancelled so I had to run-walk to make the 8:30.

The day started freezing cold and foggy (see pic). By midday, it was spring. I’m not complaining – simply reporting. But, we’re back to cold for a week soon. Maybe after that spring…

Haircut and errands, including a visit to spaceNK (which I said doesn’t have perfume – I lied: there’s a small corner of things like DS & Durga, Jo Loves and Tom Ford – not hugely exciting, and there are actually more candles than bottles of stuff).

I did get a Lisa Eldridge lipstick – a late self birthday gift (really, it was on the bday list – and so allowed – not an impulse purchase, so not breaking the NO.BUY.).

I got something called Medici. I love the name. It’s a dark rose sort of, with a bit of red, a bit of brown, a bit of maybe one day I’ll get to Venice for Carnival. Here, this is what it looks like.

I’m still waiting for March to do a lipstick post. Please.

I ran by John Lewis, our remaining department store, and finally managed to test Clinique Aromatics Elixir on skin rather than paper – like 10 big … I mean huge … spritzes.

Not to belabour the point made already on the blog — by Portia, by Tom, by me even — that this is incredible — and I don’t understand why I hadn’t been willing to try it years ago. I was a Prescriptives girl, though, and felt Clinique was a bit … pedestrian. Little did I know, clearly.

But anyway given a number of us have written about this fairly recently, why am I revisiting, beating the proverbial dead (you enter word)?

Well, because this makes me think about perfumery before everyone and their mother thought they should have a go – when the point was to smell good but good had certain implications and some well thought out ideas.

I love my weirds, my interesting niche, my ‘let’s play with a concept’, the deliberately provocative, etc. They definitely have a place in my collection.

But every once in a while I think what would I bring as a desert island fragrance – ie, if I could only bring one bottle for a fairly long period with no access to anything else even to sample? If I had limited packing space and no access to online or major retail outlets? I can feel you twitching.

That’s where a perfume like Aromatics Elixir comes in. It actually is something that could keep my brain occupied – and it really does smell sensationally good.

And I think with older fragrances you weren’t meant to be looking for individual notes. Rather, the whole would parse as legible – ie, it takes you on a journey that can be followed: an opening, development, a drydown. More like reading and then re-reading a book you really enjoyed first time round but that gets better and you see more with each go-round.

Fragrantica calls this a chypre floral. Well, I guess, maybe. Launched in 1971 the nose is Bernard Chant. I’m sure I’m repeating myself and everyone else about this. But, as I’d drenched myself in it I actually got to think about it properly. Notes: chamomile, aldehydes, clary sage, coriander, geranium, lemon verbena, Brazilian rosewood, bergamot, carnation, rose, ylang, orris root, jasmine, tuberose, orange blossom, oakmoss, patchouli, incense, vetiver, sandalwood and musk.

Things I like about that list.

• That bergamot isn’t up front, which it is in so many other perfumes.
• That there’s no pink pepper.
• That the aldehydes don’t make me twitchy – they just add to the witchiness that Tom mentioned.
• That there are ‘big white flowers’ and you get to enjoy that aspect of things, but it doesn’t scream ‘I’m a big white floral’.
• That, as with all the best fragrances, it’s high/low: I could see wearing this with diamonds (if I had them) or while gardening (actually, if I had diamonds, I’d wear them while I gardened).

Ultimately, what I guess I mean is that this feels a little like wearing an in-joke in a positive way – like, you ‘get’ it (the perfume), and the reward is you get to wear it.

If that makes any sense at all.

Pics: Pexels, Wiki Perfume, mine

  • alityke says:

    This was supposed to be in response to your question about Prescriptives.

    • cinnamon says:

      Thought so 🙂 I loved Prescriptives. The colour match I got at Berdorf was perfect. What are the VB pencils like?

      • alityke says:

        Tricky to use. It takes practice. I also have some Hildun Kajals. A little less expensive but so similar & great colours.
        The trick with both the VBs & Hildun pencils is to put them where you want them, leave them to set for 30-45 seconds before smudging. I use a brush to smudge rather than the “smudger” at the end of the pencil. I find using the smudger supplied just rubs out the kajal.
        The VBs are very, very soft & need to go in the fridge before sharpening.
        Would I buy VBs again? No, I’ll get the Hilduns

  • alityke says:

    Yes in the 90s. The best colour eyeshadow palette I ever owned is sadly missed.
    They SA on counter at House of Fraser was rubbish at colour matching though

  • AnnieA says:

    My nose has an opposing opinion: Aromatics Elixer smelled like a wet canvas tent…

  • Dina C. says:

    Loved your comments about AE, Cinnamon, and perfumery in general. I agree that classic chypres have a place, still, in the canon because of this. Their structure and beauty is undeniable; they hold up so well throughout a day. Which is why I love vintage scents so much. Your new lipstick looks like a pretty shade. It looks like our East coast weather is turning warmer this week. We’ll try to send some your way!

    • cinnamon says:

      Thank you regarding weather. I think we’re looking at another week of colder and then maybe a turn to warmer. Agree on vintage/older style perfumes. Of course, it’s fun to play around with different things but things like this (and Shalimar for me) just play better on the skin (and for the brain).

  • Portia says:

    Makes perfect sense to me Cinnamon, one of my long time faves. You smell fabulous.
    You need some diamonds to do the gardening in. I only wear the engagement earring but it’s a Tiffany diamond so…
    Portia xx

    • cinnamon says:

      Love the idea of the engagement earring. I had a sort of after-the-fact (ie, we’d been married for years) sapphire engagement ring. It got sold, along with my wedding band, during a very poor period. Grocery money for months. Oh, the diamonds will happen … just not sure when … and I will definitely garden in them.

  • March says:

    I’d love to do a lipstick post, except I live in a place that doesn’t even have a Sephora, much less good department stores. I wear lipstick every day, but it’s usually a combo of old stand-bys! I tried the first round of Lisa Eldridge lippies and sadly they didn’t work for me.

    • cinnamon says:

      Hmmm, I still think an ‘old standby’ post would be interesting. I wonder if you tried the LE velvet mattes? Those don’t work on me — the texture is just wrong. I have three of hers that do though: a Luxuriously Lucent, one of the balm colours and now the stupid pricey but refillable one. I recall years ago you writing about a Mars liquid l/s where the colour looked amazing…

      • March says:

        Hey, maybe I will! And the new NARS Explicit lipsticks are the ones I am reaaalllly wanting to try, but that involves an hour drive to Albuquerque, so it hasn’t happened yet. Yes, they were the velvet mattes — too dry and the undertone was wrong? I hate spending that kind of $ on something I can’t try first.

  • Tom says:

    Love the lipstick! Love the write-up more. I do love the scent and not just because I love the dichotomy of this kind of weird scent coming from astringent and lab coat Clinique..

    • cinnamon says:

      I still think your cauldron comment must be one of the best perfume descriptives ever. Yeah, the lab coat stuff. I guess someone somewhere in the company got a bee in their bonnet about M Chant and ended up with something sublime but so completely out of character with the brand. All the better for us.

  • Ellen says:

    Love, love, love your Lisa Eldridge lipstick. I wish there was someplace I could try them in person. Also appreciate your notes on the Clinique Aromatics elixir. I wore it quite a bit in the 80’s. I have a little sample from STC that I purchased after someone wrote about it. Must pull it out to enjoy! It will be fun to try again with your notes in hand.

    • cinnamon says:

      I like what she does — very considered. But also silly money, as most high end makeup is. Still, you don’t get colours like this often from drug store brands. I think the colour goes well with AE.

  • Maggiecat says:

    I love your new lipstick! I would like to love AE, but something in it goes unpleasantly sharp on my skin. Still, your review makes me want to try it once more, to see if either it or I have changed.

    • cinnamon says:

      I think it’s worth another go-round — if only to either confirm your experience or open up a whole other want 🙂

  • alityke says:

    The only scent that I’ve been stalked for.
    I’m so delighted EL sorted out the greasy note from the 2019 version.
    I’m horrified I left it out of my Top Tens on alitykescents

    • cinnamon says:

      Yup, I can see this engendering interesting. You see, I missed all the weird and maybe not so wonderful iterations because I ignored it for so long. Did Prescriptives ever come to the UK?

  • Richard Potter says:

    If I had to give up all of my fragrances except for five. Aromatics Elixir would be a keeper. It’s glorious!

  • Linda says:

    I love every single word you’ve written here about Aromatics Elixir, Cinnamon. If I were to highlight each of your points, this reply would be longer than your post. So I’ll just send a huge thank you.

    • cinnamon says:

      Thank you back at you. This is one of the things I love about perfume conversations — when things connect and someone far away is saying ‘yes, yes, I get that’.

  • Rene Groyer says:

    Clinique Aromatics Elixir is really a masterpiece even if you don’t like it,it’s really so well blended and a classic
    I never really liked it myself but I will revisit it after reading your article.

    • cinnamon says:

      Ah, that enabling. I have, in the past, had a tendency to dismiss things. I have mostly divested that habit — there’s so much out there that may make one go hmph but is very worthwhile.

  • Cyndi says:

    I wore Aromatics Elixir back in the late seventies or early eighties, and I loved It. I haven’t worn it in years, but after reading your post, I think I may want to re-visit it. Thanks!

    • cinnamon says:

      Would be very interested to hear your thoughts if you do revisit. Would it stand up to your previous experience…

  • Rina says:

    I love all the notes and it should be a no-brainer but it hates me. Then, I got my hands on the LE oil and that I can wear. Not sure why one works over the other, but it does. Plus, the LE bottle is so pretty! As for my deserted island scent, either POAL or L’Wren Scott.

    • alityke says:

      I’m SO envious of you having the LE oil. It was swoon worthy but at the time I had other financial priorities & I’ve never seen it on resale sites

    • Portia says:

      OH YES! That LE Oil is bloody gorgeous Rina. Thanks for the reminder. I have one hidden away. What a sensational reimagining of the original.
      Portia xx

      • cinnamon says:

        Portia, do you have everything ever released tucked somewhere in your collection???

    • cinnamon says:

      Yup, notes lists. They promise certain things and then you spray and go: uh, no. But interesting on the oil. And what is POAL? I’ve wracked my brain but can’t identify.