The Plum

 

 

 

A Tale of Beginner’s Mind

by Musette

Every now and then I’ll meet someone who admits to lurking on the Posse but won’t comment, afraid that they don’t know enough, thinking I , The Great Musette, am so knowledgeable about perfume.  (wait.  the Earth just shifted off its axis from the Posse’s collective stop/drop/roll of hilarity). I know next to nothing – but I delight in having a Beginner’s Mind, always open to new information and experience.

 

And so it is thus with Parfum de Therese.  When I first was introduced to the Malle line, I began with weird scent beauty Fleur de Cassie.  I  then got seduced by Angeliques and Carnal Flower and somehow Parfum de Therese just floated on past my consciousness.  Recently, though, March and I had a conversation about Dior and in the way those conversations go, she mentioned PdTherese – “I would think you would really like that one, as you are such a fan of the vintage Diors”.  Huh?  Oh, yeah.  That Roudnitska feller.  Dior?  Oh, yeah.  That’s right:  only the creator of  two or three of my Holy Grails.  Yeah, that guy.

Sampled it once.  “Hmmmm….I see what she means…wonder why this smells  so ‘different’ from the other Malles (stop snickering – yeah, I knew the story, I know Edmond Roudnitska…I know, I know….I just didn’t ‘know’).   I sampled again – and the little dominoes that comprise my rattly mind slowly clicked into place.  Sampled a third time, this time at Barneys…and this shimmering veil of Holy Cow! How did I miss this one??” descended over me, along with the  gobsmacking beauty of the perfume, of course.  The ever-patient Lydia.  le sigh.  How she keeps from just slapping me is a mystery.

This Is Perfume.   Old School Perfume.  Nicknamed ‘The Plum” by Roudnistka’s circle of perfume pros, it is comprised of many notes, including Mandarin orange, melon, jasmine, plum, cedar, vetiver, leather, rose, nutmeg  – and like all Roudnitska perfumes it smells to me like all of its notes and none of its notes.  It’s almost impossible to pick any one of the notes out, so seamlessly is this constructed – don’t let the plum fool you – this couldn’t be further from a fuity-floral if you put it on the moon.  There’s an obvious connection between this and vintage Diorella and Diorama, both Roudnitska masterpieces, but even more striking is, to my nose, the parallel between this and  the vaunted, vintage Femme ( an early Roudnitska), with its plush, plummy, sexual self.  Both are the Old School intimate perfume versions of ‘skin scents’ (plums smell like sex to me.  Not ‘having sex’ – just ..sex)  but with serious heft and structure.  One really needs to rise to the occasion with these  (I can’t imagine throwing on a pair of shorts and wearing either of these scents – then again, I can’t imagine throwing on a pair of shorts! The mind boggles)  Angela has a gorgeous review of vintage Femme here.  M. Roudnitska took the sexbombaliciouness of Femme and dialed it back a little, creating a bespoke scent for his lady wife that hints at womanly sensuality – but in a very private manner.

Parfum de Therese is a ladylike scent.  But not some rarified spun-sugar doll.  A real woman, who probably washed the dinner dishes every evening and then sat down to work through complex chemical formulas – or to help her son with his math homework or just enjoy a cognac with her husband – an effortlessly chic woman, comfortable in her own lovely skin (I see her making an incredible French Potato Salad, then sitting down to enjoy it, on the terrace, with a glass of Chablis).  Looking at pictures of Mme Roudnitska I suspect her husband, in creating Parfum de Therese, did not create an homage to her.  It is an homage of her.  I am thrilled to have the opportunity to wear this and will try to be worthy.  Thanks, March, for giving me a reason to stand up straight and do my hair!  I need no reason to drink the Chablis. Or the cognac.

 

image:  detail from Delisa Summer, all rights reserved

0 0 votes
Article Rating
49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Winifrieda
15 years ago

I first smelled this in Mecca, Sydney, several years ago when my reawakening was occurring…I said to the lovely young and very knowledgeable young man doing the Malle thing with the blotters and booths…
‘this man adored his wife, thought of her forever beautiful and desirable and immortal’…then went to buy it and it had all sold out!
Since then I’ve done all the study, learnt about Edmund, found the vintage Femme, Diorama (GAAAASP thunk), Diorella. I can only hope that we can’t blame the genius Edmund for our modern fruity florals…I think he did for melon what Mitsouko did for peach; just made it the symbol of lush tempting femininity.

Winifrieda
15 years ago
Reply to  Winifrieda

P.S. I think ‘Poison’ is in fact something of an outcome of Roudniska’s legacy of incredible almost confronting perfumes….especially Diorama…yes OK!!@!kill me now!!!

Dante's Bra
15 years ago

I’ve been sniffin’ and loving this one for the past month, and I always find something new in it, even though I don’t have the vocab to describe it. Today it’s very aldehyde’ey on the open; i’m really coming to love fruit notes that teeter on the edge of rotten, like in the vintage Diors (I always get them mixed up). Wistful, fleeting beauty.

I also love that it has the richness and tapestry of old school perfume, but has a lightness or flexibility or something so that I don’t feel like it’s wearing me.

My only reservation with Therese is that it is really fleeting– like, two hours, tops. All gone. I wonder if the lotion lasts any longer, and would it have the same glorious complexity?

yvree
15 years ago

An ongoing lurker steps out to post;) Musette, Thanks for reviewing. God I really needed to break the PdT out for summer! …I read another blog/review that mentioned a “cilantro” vibe..I love cilantro, so this hits that spot.which I get with “lime” in the opening .It is an unusual frag, especially in this day.

*sharing funny newbie story here*
PdT was my first niche/boutique purchase! and I sought it out based on reviews when I was researching Sophia Grossman and heard it mentioned. and well, for “namesake” vanity reasons too;) I was like “what the hay”. I deserve something luxurious. And Therese sounded luxurious! (I was not a complete fume hound at this point and just coming to accept my weird, then nameless, “hobby”)

When my friends asked me to describe my new “expensive” bottle: I said “good, it smells like any perfume. no idea why I spent so much” …(I hear the collective gasping here any many levels, oh and I no longer tell what anything costs anymore;) So glad I never posted this before! The Perfume goddess did not revoke my “newbie perfumnista card” but issued a new one instead (with one then unknown stipulation)!

OF course collected and I cherished my PdT,kept in my fridge..almost afraid to even use a 250ml (I no longer have this problem), so I got obsessed and I took up the cause to find another scent that smelled like it!….(laughter TOTALLY is appropriate here). So after saying that that PdT smells like “perfume”, 2 years and TONS more sniffing, I have found the ONLY thing (IMO) close to what I like about PdT is vintage Diorama…Now, with respect, I am overjoyed that Malle offers such a classic scent, *almost* regardless price point. Because it saves the tears of (not) finding a bottle of vintage Diorama!…or femme etc.

Newbie Lesson learned: Respect the fume! And a newbie must laugh at herself and has enjoyed her quest, as it has opened so many new experiences. PdT is not an HG but it is irreplaceable in my collection! Will always have beginner mind (can only pray to acquire tact)

Catherine
15 years ago

Great Musette! I’m so glad you have Parfum de Therese another try. She’s one of my favorite, favorite beauties, and the reason I’m so in love with Roudnitska!

Beautiful painting! xoxo

15 years ago

I’ve still not tried Ms Therese’s perfume… still trying to concentrate on what I think would appeal to me personally, since I don’t get the chance for free sniffies very often.

And, okay, it still doesn’t sound like my kind of thing, not even after this very evocative review. A chypre with fruit? Prolly gonna kill me, I’ll give it a miss.

Thing is, if I keep avoiding stuff that sounds like stuff that nearly killed me before, how will I know if I missed out on Twoo Wuv, the kind that sneaks up on you out of nowhere, the funny just-friends friend that suddenly lays a big old romancy-schmancy kiss on you, and your knees go, and your heart turns over, and you think, “How’d I almost miss this?” Aargh.

Okay, new plan: Anything I pursue has to be something I think I’ll like, but I’ll be open to surprises, a perpetual newbie wonder-and-awe machine…

Lavanya
15 years ago

I smelled Therese very recently too and was very impressed- It was the olfactory equivalent of a yellow spot of light (At dusk). My mom tried it on her skin and it smelt gorgeous on her. However, I am not sure if it is the heat, but the next couple of times I smelled it on her, it seemed more ‘difficult’ (and the opening started to smell (to her) of ‘cockroach powder’ that is used in India to kill cockroaches..LOL. Once she made that connection/association- I couldn’t get it out of my head either).

I am going to wait for a cool breezy night and try it again. The perfume isn’t very me (as in, I can’t see myself wearing it often)- but I do like yellow light..

AnnieA
15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

And for me L’air du Désert Marocain = Lysol…

15 years ago

i do like and respect this one, but it is so definitely HERS, and not mine, i can’t see myself ever wearing it. love his work, though, with femme de rochas being one of my holy grails, maybe THE holy grail.

15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

ha… you’re funny.

yes, vintage and new femme. any incarnation. all incarnations.

Admin
15 years ago

You painted that painting, right? Cool.

I knew you’d like Therese! It’s not really my thang (neither are those Diors) – to melon-herbal or whatever, but they’re pretty darn special.

maggiecat
15 years ago

Lovely post – and you’ve made me want to sample this!

Teri
15 years ago

I feel honored to share a name with this lovely scent. I’d been prepared not to like it, as I’d heard it contained melon notes, which usually make me run screaming. But as with so many things, in the hands of a master, it works.

At times I’m so sad to have been born in this era of perfumery. I don’t want to smell like laundry, or fake strawberries, or bubble gum. I want to smell interesting, enigmatic, and slightly dangerous. One just doesn’t get that with tutti fruiti scents.

I so agree that PdT is one of the last of the perfumes of a different era. I know she’s lonely, though, and would like some ‘friends’. :d

HemlockSillage
15 years ago
Reply to  Teri

Sign me up for “interesting, enigmatic and slightly dangerous,” too! I love that. My SOTD is Vero Profumo’s Rubj. . .and I think it may be in that ballpark.

I tried L’Agent by Agent Provocateur yesterday, and had that vibe, too, in a much more obvious femme fatale way. (Rose, patch, amber, musk–dark and *huge* sillage in 100 degree heat)

KirstenMarie
15 years ago
Reply to  Teri

Ooooh – yes, that’s it exactly! The other classic I mourn is the REAL Apres L’Ondee. I visit the picture of the full bottle on TPC. A perfume that’s a real perfume – not, and I quote with full-hearted agreement – “laundry, fake strawberries, or bubble gum.” Gah, how can perfume grist mills think that is what women want…oh, right, they’re corrupting the next generation that doesn’t know the sheer feminity of Diorissimo or the exotic Shalimar or Coty’s Chypre, before Coty went to Walgreen’s.

Thanks for a lovely post, Musette! I’ll dedicate a glass of Chablis to it tonight apres work.

donanicola
15 years ago

What a coincidence. I bought a bottle of Carnal Flower this weekend (the joy!) and asked for a sample of PdT as I had been thinking that I needed to understand it better. When I first started reading the blogs back in 2005/6 I realised my tastes ran to the chypres so ordered a sample of PdT from Les Scenteurs. Unfortunately all I could smell back then was melon and I didn’t like it. But gradually all the other Roudnitskas claimed a part of my heart (though I’d always loved Diorella) so I felt it was time to try again. So yesterday (yes! yesterday!) I tried again and it’s love. LT mentions a crude quality which he is not keen on and I think I can see what he means though I wouldn’t use the word crude but bold. Like a bold streak of ochre daubed through an otherwise green toned oil painting. Anyway, it’s just gorgeous and your review does it justice whilst being such fun to read – thanks!

hilary
15 years ago

Oh, Thèrése, it’s wonderful. I went through more samples of this than of anything else – four, I think – and still haven’t bought a bottle, although I sprang for a 10ml decant which is doing very nicely. I took it on a romantic trip to Paris this spring but was surprised to hear it specially complimented, since it’s so classic and chyprish. (But then, the other favourite seems to be Parfum Sacre, so he obviously has good taste.) Anyway, this was a wonderful tribute, thanks!
Musette, is that a painting of yours?

Hilary
15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

Hey, I love classic chypres too! But they don’t necessarily appeal to 20-something boys with no particular interest in perfume. Or, so I thought…

It’s a lovely painting and a lovely detail. The woman looks very alive, very well-lived.

15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

Exactly what I thought when I saw the image: “I bet that’s one of Miss M’s paintings. And I’d like to have coffee with that lady – I bet she could tell some stories.”

HemlockSillage
15 years ago

Exactly! This post is a fantastic summary of why I love this fragrance.

Thèrése is one of those perfumes I had to grow to love. When I first sniffed it, the fruit, the complexity was too much. I hated it! I’d still consider myself a relative newbie, loving fragrance lifelong, but only reading about it, studying it since 2005. People write about how their tastes change in perfume, and I’d agree. I smile when I read about people saying never say never about a scent note. My world has opened up wildly. Now Thèrése is perfect to me.

Austenfan is right; sensual without becoming vulgar sums it up well. There is a thickness to this, a richness without heaviness that is difficult to describe. I’m so glad M. Roudnitska shared this with us. I want to be the person this perfume embodies. I makes me want to dress up a bit, and see where it takes me. Be well.

P.S. Love the image you chose, Musette!

Francesca
15 years ago

What a great post. I have to find my sample and try this again. I remember liking it, but the melon got in my way just a bit.

Ann
15 years ago
Reply to  Francesca

Hi, divine Miss M!! Lovely post (and art, too), as always. I am with Francesca above (waves to her) as well. Need to revisit as I seem to remember a bit of melon, too.
And you all are so right about the Malles: No matter how you feel about them, they are a classic (and classy) collection. Carnal Flower, Musc Ravageur oil and En Passant are among my faves, although I am trying to find the love for Fleur de Cassie, despite that iffy opening.

Austenfan
15 years ago

Glad you have discovered the gloriousness that is Thérèse. It’s effortlessly classy, and sensual without ever becoming vulgar.
I recently purchased a bottle of this at the lovely Senteurs d’Ailleurs in Brussels. It was a great experience as I sniffed quite a few of the Malles; Portrait of a Lady, Iris Poudre, Vetiver Extraordinaire, Noir Epices, Carnal Flower and L’Eau d’Hiver. I ended up leaving with Noir Epices on my left arm, L’Eau d’Hiver on my right and my hair sprayed with Carnal Flower. I must have had considerable sillage. I guess CF will be my next purchase from this line.

Joe
15 years ago

Mmmm. Nice.

Yes, yes. Thèrése. My ladylike side embraces it fully. Heh.

Seriously though, I rock the hell out of this and Femme both. Love them. Glad to hear it seduced you… finally.

nozknoz
15 years ago

We really owe Cousin Freddie for bringing this to us, don’t we? With all the reformulation of the classics, this is the last true Roudnitska.

I think it’s hard to process perfume intellectually because we don’t have adequate language for it. Sure, one can list the notes, but that’s like listing trees on a mountain, not descibing the shape of the mountain. The closest we get is a wonderful analogy like your description of Mme Roudnitska (OK, or calling it sex, LOL). There’s nothing wrong with your brain, Musette!

Austenfan
15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

It is an outstanding collection, I think. Remember Luca calling him the Diaghilev of fragrance, somewhere on his ( no longer functioning) blog. Smelling a whole lot of them as I did the other day, I was impressed by how good they are. What I also find interesting that even though they are, especially the earlier ones, all done by different perfumers they share this quality of purity, of clarity almost. Which must be due to the editing.

nozknoz
15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

That’s so funny – and I’m so glad he decided to invest his wealth and talent in the 8th art!

nozknoz
15 years ago
Reply to  Musette

I think I know what you mean about the sex thing, Musette, the basic generative life force, the promise of fertility. And melon is so perfect for that – real fruit, not that synthetic stuff! I know, it’s probably all synthetic, but NOT that aquatic melon.

Also totally agree with Austenfan – there IS a consistent feel across the collection, in spite of different noses and genres. That’s a good observation!